ARCO
Course contents

Findings

FINDING · 01/11

The combo's trajectory is dictated by the first movement: the gazelle exits on a curve, and the rest of the combo has to respect that curve.

After the fakie gazelle it is tempting to correct toward a straight line to 'tidy up' the combo before the heel press. That correction breaks the flow of the direction and reads as a cut in the rhythm.

Why does it happen?

The gazelle, by its arc mechanics, ends up pointing in a curved direction. If the trajectory wasn't decided before entering, the body tries to return to the straight line as the 'safe' position — and every movement in the combo fights the direction of the previous one.

How was it detected?

In episode 1, by contrasting the combo with a slalom example: a mabrouk or grapevine keeps a sustained straight line; this combo instead asks for a wide sustained curve from the gazelle to the 180.

Implications

Before entering any combo, decide the trajectory — the sustained direction all the movements will live on. Here: enter the gazelle, accept its curve and do the heel press inside it. Picturing the full curved line before starting is what keeps the rhythm.

Related

FINDING · 02/11

The 180 exit out of the heel press is a collapse, not a jump.

Reading the exit as a jump invites the wheels to leave the ground: you lose contact with the floor and the end of the combo becomes a different move, with a different risk and a different aesthetic.

Why does it happen?

The 180 at the end of a heel press visually resembles a short hop. But the heel press lives on the heels: the natural exit is letting the toes drop and the body rotate the 180 while the position collapses, not pushing upward.

How was it detected?

While breaking down the third exercise of episode 1: 'a heel press with a collapse into 180 — which is not a jump'.

Implications

Practice the exit as a controlled fall: from the heel press, release the position and rotate the 180 with the wheels seeking the floor, not escaping it. If there is lift-off, lower your speed and repeat.

Related

FINDING · 03/11

Landing the 180 isn't a decision, it's a progression: two feet first, one foot later.

Watching the full combo suggests the 180 has to land straight on one foot to enter the front open Lion. Trying it that way from the start makes the landing eat the Lion's entry: you land hunting for balance instead of pushing into the development.

Why does it happen?

The 180 and the Lion ask for two different things at the same instant: the jump asks you to absorb and the Lion asks you to push on an edge. On two feet the landing spreads the load and keeps the push available; on one foot the balance has to be settled before the push arrives.

How was it detected?

The on-screen exercises of episode 2 split the two variants into separate consecutive cards — landing on two feet first, on one foot after — while the narration clarifies that you can enter the front open Lion without needing to land on one foot.

Implications

Train the 180 on two feet until the push into the front open Lion comes without thinking, and only then try landing straight on one foot. If the Lion falls apart, the diagnosis isn't the Lion: it's that the landing is still being solved.

Related

FINDING · 04/11

Between the two Lions the rotation doesn't restart: it is the continuation of the shoulder turn that introduces the second one.

Treating the front closed Lion as a new movement — hunting for its entry from zero after finishing the front open — splits the combo into two tricks glued together and kills the speed right in the middle.

Why does it happen?

Lions are one-foot transitions: the leg coming out of the first one is the same one that has to draw the second. If the shoulders stop when the first Lion ends, the leg in the air loses its turning reference and it has to be rebuilt from the posture.

How was it detected?

In episode 2's visualization, while describing the step from one Lion to the other: continuing the rotation of the shoulders, the leg in the air introduces the front closed Lion.

Implications

Think of the development and the exit as a single shoulder gesture that never stops, and let the leg in the air decide when the second Lion comes in. It is also what makes the roll out possible: the speed that survives the foot change is the speed that rolls out.

Related

FINDING · 05/11

An inverted entry is a new combo: the same jump, skated the other way around, changes everything that follows.

Thinking of combos as closed recipes: once the list of movements you master runs out, it seems you need to learn new tricks to have new combos.

Why does it happen?

The entry defines the direction and the state in which you arrive at the development. The 180 from fakie to front (episode 2) leaves you skating forward, ready for front Lions; the same jump from front to fakie leaves you skating backwards — and that opens up the back movements and changes the energy of the whole combo.

How was it detected?

Episode 3 was explicitly built by inverting episode 2's entry: instead of entering from fakie towards the front, starting from front with a 180 jump to fakie.

Implications

Every combo you already skate brings free combos: invert the entry and ask yourself which movements become available from the new direction. The previous episode isn't a prerequisite of the new one, but playing them as a pair teaches the principle.

Related

FINDING · 06/11

The 180's landing doesn't end the jump: landing directly on the outer edge is what ignites the next movement.

Landing the 180 flat or on the inner edge forces you to rebuild the back closed Lion's entry from zero: the combo splits into jump + trick, and the impulse you carried from the fish is lost in the adjustment.

Why does it happen?

From the fish, the jump leaves one edge and looks for the opposite one: it is a jump to the opposite edge that lands on the outer edge of the landing leg. That edge is already the arc of the drawing of the 3 — the back closed Lion's entry — so landing there is landing inside the next movement.

How was it detected?

In episode 3's exercises: the fish to 180 is practiced alone — with a 180-only exit — solely to start feeling the direct landing on the outer edge, before chaining the back closed Lion.

Implications

Practice the landing as an exercise in itself: fish, 180 and landing on the outer edge, with no combo afterwards. When that edge shows up on its own, the entry into the drawing of the 3 leaves your leg in the perfect position for the open Tree.

Related

  • Concept:Slalom trajectory
  • Watch moment:
  • Watch moment:

FINDING · 07/11

The landing isn't the end of the jump: you keep absorbing while the body already predisposes itself to the next movement.

Landing the 360 already crossed turns the entry into another trick — a jump landed in a cross —; landing neutral and tidying up afterwards splits the combo into jump + trick, and the flow dies right at the seam.

Why does it happen?

The jump and the grapevine ask for different things at the same instant: the landing asks you to absorb and the front cross asks for a cross. If you wait until the landing is over to think about the cross, a dead time appears between the two parts. Predisposition splits the work: the legs keep absorbing while the body already turns towards the front cross.

How was it detected?

In episode 4's visualization: preparing the 360's landing thinking about the front cross, without falling straight into a jump landed already crossed — 'I keep falling, absorbing, but my body is already predisposing itself to the next movement'.

Implications

Practice the 360 into grapevine as an isolated exercise looking only for that feeling: absorbing while predisposing yourself. It is the general version of episode 3's finding — there the landing ignited the next movement by falling onto the outer edge; here the rule becomes transversal: every combo landing is prepared thinking about what follows.

Related

  • Concept:Flow
  • Watch moment:
  • Watch moment:
  • Watch moment:

FINDING · 08/11

The combo doesn't wait for the jump: if the 360 isn't there yet, a fakie 180 straight into the grapevine is the same entry as a progression.

Blocking the whole combo behind the hardest movement: you don't practice the grapevine or the gazelle exit until you 'have' the 360, and the episode turns into a jump tutorial.

Why does it happen?

What the grapevine needs from the entry isn't the jump: it is the state you arrive in — skating forward, ready for the front cross. The 360 and the fakie 180 leave you exactly there; they change the difficulty and the style of the entry, not the combo.

How was it detected?

Episode 4 offers it explicitly from the start — 'if you don't master your 360 jump yet, you can swap it for a fakie 180 straight into the grapevine' — and the exercises consecrate it as a progression: 180 into grapevine first, 360 into grapevine after.

Implications

When building or practicing any combo, identify the state the entry leaves you in (direction, foot, edge): any movement that leaves you in the same state is an interchangeable entry. Together with episode 3's inverted entry, it is the second way of getting free combos.

Related

  • Concept:Entry, development and exit
  • Watch moment:
  • Watch moment:

FINDING · 09/11

Two movements fuse when they share a gesture: the exit of the front open Lion — the feet coming together in a lemon — is already the entry of the fakie toe press.

Treating the combo as Lion + toe press: you exit the open Lion, stabilize and then look for the toe press. That pause splits the combo into two tricks and the toe press starts without impulse.

Why does it happen?

Shaun Unwin's method for entering the toe press is a lemon backwards and, with confidence, lifting the heels in that impulse. In the exit of the open Lion the feet come together and do exactly that lemon action — the gesture is already there; only lifting and holding is missing. If you don't recognize it, you repeat it from scratch.

How was it detected?

Episode 5: 'that same feeling is very similar when we're in the exit of the open Lion — my feet come together and do that same lemon action, and what I look for there is simply that way of lifting and holding'.

Implications

To fuse two movements, look for the shared gesture before the sequence: what does the exit of the first do that the second already asks for. Here the lemon; in other combos it will be an edge, a foot or a rotation. It's the first finding of the two-movement block.

Related

  • Concept:Fusion
  • Concept:Clean roll out
  • Watch moment:
  • Watch moment:
  • Watch moment:

FINDING · 10/11

You don't build the back open Lion yourself: entering first in front closed Lion leaves you position and momentum, and the back leg generates the second Lion through the previous movement.

Attempting the back open Lion cold — bringing in the outer part of the leg from scratch — is what makes it one of the hardest Lions to learn. Without a previous position or momentum, you force it with the leg and it doesn't come out.

Why does it happen?

The back open Lion enters through the outer part and exits through the inner one. The front closed Lion leaves you exactly in a position from which introducing the outer part is natural, and its exit loads the back leg with an impulse that, when you switch feet, becomes the Lion. The inherited momentum does the work, not your own force.

How was it detected?

Episode 6: 'entering first in front closed Lion gives you a position and a momentum to be able to introduce the outer part of the leg… with the impulse the back leg carries, it practically generates the Lion through the momentum of the previous movement'.

Implications

When a movement resists you in isolation, look for the one that naturally precedes it: a combo can be the way to unlock a movement, not only the goal after mastering it. If you're forcing the second movement, the momentum was lost at the seam — check that you didn't cut the first one.

Related

  • Concept:Fusion
  • Concept:Entry, development and exit
  • Watch moment:
  • Watch moment:
  • Watch moment:

FINDING · 11/11

The swivel produces momentum at the entry that gets reused in the jump's rotation: if you continue the turn of the shoulders, the 360 doesn't start — it continues.

Doing the swivel, stabilizing in fakie and jumping from scratch: the rotation was cut and the 360 has to be generated again with your own force. That's two tricks, and the jump comes out heavier than if you did it alone.

Why does it happen?

The swivel is rotating 180 entering on the corresponding edges, with a push from the heels — a short curve that leaves the shoulders already turning in one direction. That rotation is exactly what the jump needs. If you keep it alive and only continue it, the take-off happens mid-turn; if you stop it to 'prepare' the jump, you throw away the momentum you had just produced.

How was it detected?

Episode 7: 'joining a swivel to a 360 seems very useful to me because you produce momentum at the entry that you can reuse in the rotation of your jump… in that same direction in which I already made the turn, if I continue the rotation of the shoulders everything is simply ready to take off'.

Implications

When a movement ends rotating, the next one can inherit that rotation: think of the combo as a single rotation split in two — the first half on the ground, the second in the air. It's flow applied to a turn: the seam between swivel and jump tends to zero.

Related

  • Concept:Fusion
  • Concept:Flow
  • Watch moment:
  • Watch moment: